WHAT??
No seriously.. what?
do I have something on my face? huh?
what?
do I smell like a camel?
do I emit ultra-violet rays that say "I am going to fuck you"?
What??
What is it?
tell me.. am honest.. dont fuck around.. WHAT??
am tired of acting weird now.. are you going to tell me?
WHAT?
I beg you.. please.. what?
Crap..
Why??
WHY?
do I have something on my face? huh?
what?
do I smell like a camel?
do I emit ultra-violet rays that say "I am going to fuck you"?
What??
What is it?
tell me.. am honest.. dont fuck around.. WHAT??
am tired of acting weird now.. are you going to tell me?
WHAT?
I beg you.. please.. what?
Crap..
Why??
WHY?
posted by Prashant Gautam at 2:07 AM
26 Comments:
dear distressed,
may be it's the face itself..
camel, eh? skunk, could it be?
radioactive emission exclaiming "I AM FUCKED" does it like no other.
"tired of acting weird" - well, about time.
hmm... i quite like the begging part - are you kneeling?
"why"?!
later.busy figuring out "what".
you now have a multitude of words/phrases/sentences to be misconstrued/twisted/mutilated into a repartee that would (hopefully) be a better read than this one-in-every-blog kinda post.
yours,
Anonymous
how do i reply to that?
did i sleep with your wife/girlfriend/sister/you?
i am happy to know people(just "you") follow my posts religiously.
even if you were to write an entire work of fiction in the comments section, it would not be enough "to be misconstrued/twisted/mutilated into a repartee etc...."
whatever man. i am writing for my pleasure and you and your dissatisfaction dont make much of a difference to me. i dont think you have enough vitriol to criticise somebody un-anonymously. its easy to be the guy behind blinds. even if your advice had been good, i would have had credibility issues. you could be just another blog hopper who had a moment of sanity(and unfortunately i fell as a victim to that.)
cant do much to change man.
here are the answers sequentially -
not the way you did.
your roomie is not my wife/girlfriend/sister/me.
obviously i follow your posts - religiously? - i'd let you believe that - stay happy.
The next few lines make no sense to me -
"if you were... repartee etc" - i over-estimated you.
"whatever...to me" - the comment belies itself.
"i dont think...blinds" - it's like telling invisible man that he lacks guts for not showing himself in a fight scenario - the guy is *always* invisible.
"even if...to that)" - good advice is good advice - source inconsequential. credibility issues, falling victim to somebody's moment of sanity?? laughable.
"can't...man" - cudn't care less. a comment is a means of expression. nobody's interested enough to attempt to "change" anything/body.
your posts had led me to believe you had a sense of humour and rationality - your comment suggests all that's merely a display - yours to deal with. i limit myself to the posts - as long as they are worth it.
why do you read my blog?
1. entertainment value
2. to draw a judgement on my personality
3. you like reading
4. you dont have much to do
5. you know me very well and this blog brings out the unknown part of me
6. none of the above
i dont exactly know why you read my blog again and again but i can tell you, being judgemental, that too about a person you hardly know, and then going on expressing your views does not display right kind of attitude, does it?
sense of humor and rationality are two virtues which can be, and are, judged relatively. what may be funny and logical to me might be not-so-funny and irrational to you. whatever i write here makes sense to me, in either funny or rational way (sometimes in both). for example, this post "what??" might look like a piece of crap to you, but it satisfies me because i happen to know the context in which it was posted. I consider it least important to make the details of it known because this post is for me. i dont care if the readers understand zilch because, as i say again and again, i am writing for my benefits. i dont think it gets simpler than that. i bet you find it hard to believe. happens!
now that the content of posts is taken care of, something about my writing style. it is the way it is because of my rather limited vocabulary and my ineptness to transform thoughts into sentences with 100% efficiency (or for that matter even 40% efficiecy). again it works well enough for me.
about being "invisible", i am sorry dude but i find your arguements incomprehensible (but then again i am a not-so-rational person). a person would remain "invisible" in a fight scenario because
1. he cant help but be invisible, its not in his control to make himself visible (not possible mate)
2. he wants to play fair and is considerate of the fact that the other warriors might be a little too intimidated with his persence known (pfffftttt.. cant be, can it?)
3. he is wary of the fact that the others might just realise that he is a talentless fellow and can do nothing but pass comments and they may just exploit his weaknesses if he makes his identity known. or in other words, he is afraid of the counter attack, if any. (it seems highly probable but then again i should not/cannot make judgements because i am not rational enough)
4. putting 3 less euphemistically, he is a wuss
5. he/she was romantically involved with the opponent (not quite the case, if mr. anonymous is a boy)
i seriously dont get why you remain unanonymous. you dont have a blogger account/gmail id/yahoo id/any goddamned mail id? or are you one of those important people i mentioned when i first replied to your comment? (it is not possible man)
it really doesnt make much of a difference to me but then it is quite tempting to be involved in an arguement (a futile one in this case).
you cant possible be my sister, can you?
I read your blog coz i can identify with what you write.
1."i dont think you have enough vitriol...moment of sanity."
2."being judgemental,...right kind of attitude, does it?"
talk's cheap, dude.
my comment reflects my take on the post - i like/dislike it based on my interpretation of it, which might totally differ from the author's. it's quite possible that a post i find good because of the meaning i derive from it, ceases to appear even remotely reasonable once i know the context in which it was written. so down with the "u-don't-know-the-context-crap" - i am not supposed to unless the author chooses to tell, which is clearly not the case here.
the dissection of the "invisible man analogy" that follows is again immature and irrational. my fault - must have chosen a better (read easier-to-understand) example. i keep over estimating you.
i'm waiting for an opportune moment to disclose my identity.. an overwhelmingly good post is what i m looking forward to..
i like dramatic entrances.period.
one of the important people/your sister - quite possible.this is the fun part of being anonymous.
parting shot - the argument indulges you, you don't get indulged in the argument.(and i am doing it again - overestimating i.e.)
77 more to go.
Come on anonymous! I miss you. A day without you seems like a century to be frank. Have checked this many times today already.
You do seem to be interesting, however big an idiot you might (or might not) be. We need more like you. An intelligent (with words here) enemy is preferable to a foolish friend goes the old saying.
Smack your lips, relish, relish.
Advice: Like I opine, screw being politically correct.
are haa yaar - kaha chala gaya - masti aane lag gayi thi yaar - pg ki maar li gayi hai . :D
Atta boy/girl anonymous! Disappointed though, that you continue to speak in a politically correct manner. The very obvious use of euphemisms for "you're an asshole" makes for a tiring read. Do you realise all your comments could be cut short by 10000 words if you use that phrase ;)
And don't mind Soham saying "kahan chala gaya" (if you are a girl, that is). He's a Bengali so forgive the screwed grammar. He probably still does not know we recognise two different sexes in Hindi.
P.S.: was reading older posts on this blog a few days ago. Couldn't help but wonder if you're someone from the good old Sambhar brigade...
i kow how many sexes there are in hindi - thank you very much - but @anon - i ust assumed that you were a guy because i happen to be a chauvinistic pig - ut in case you are not - nothing could delight me more.
@ soham
I am not - a chauvinistic pig i.e. that's all i can let slip, keeping my anonymity intact. ;)
@anon : I never implied that you were a chauvinistic pig.
@johnny :tumhaari maar liyi gayi hai . Bahut maza aaya .
well, a sentence can be interpreted in many ways..
the key lies in finding the one that offers maximum advantage to oneself.i did just that ;)
And i would request everyone on this forum to cut down on using abuses . Using english abuses does not beautify the language at all - infact - it leaves an impression of extreme banality. Try to keep your language civilized - not necessarily "politically correct"
@johnny - i have meaning to say this to you for a long time - you seem to have procured a very wrong concept of "being politically correct ". Not using slang or abuses does not imply "political correctness".
@anon - It would be greatly welcomed if you would reveal yourself to us - conversing with a virtual personality is not something we guys prefer.
I think I need to re-phrase what your euphemisms stand for. What you write more or less seems to imply "you are an asshole and I am a very mysterious smart-ass".
It seems, other than a very tardy dissection of your lengthy views (not unlike what Prashant had been doing), there is no way of making you realise what well framed confusing, nonsensical statements you have been consistently coming up with. However, I consider it more prudent to let you be. Would thoroughly like you to build up another dissertation on why everyone else is an asshole. Wait, you're yet to reach the why part.
@ soham
We've known all along that it does not take much more than the usage of words like 'asshole' and 'dumbfuck' to impress you. Anyway, mazaa to aaya.
fee fii fo fum
move over jerks - here i come.
You are wrong about the choice of words that are required to impress me . I wish you had bothered to do some research before sullying my image .for all you know anon could be a chick dude :P
anyway - i am going for dinner now- i would request anon to continue this conversation tomorrow - mere endsems khatam ho jayenge yaar - tu tab aa jana .
@ soham
sorry - don't have em, can't flaunt em...
@ johnny
there's a way - this was it.
point taken.
@ all
shall we move on to the next post now that we've sucked all the fun outta this one.. or are we still after setting the record?
plus i miss pg.
I wonder how the sentence "I am a chauvinistic pig" may be interpreted as "you are a chauvinistic pig".
Does beating the hell out of grammar constitute interpretation for you. The abstinence from use of logic continues.
@lund skywalker
aboard are you welcomed, of your ways we know well, although annoy the lady (?) your name might.
@ soham
The only image you have is virtual. And among the many ways to impress a chic(?), seems to be mindless flattery, so I think you may've got it right there.
yeh to laundiya hai be - bhais ki taang- saala pg hamesha laundiyon ko kaise attract kar leta hai ?
@anon - PG mein aisa kya hai jo mujhe mein nahi hain ?
@Lund - WTF dude - whats wrong with you ? Do you always have to behave as your name suggests ?
soham ganguly.. you better ask this "lund" dumbfuck to keep to himself. or i would have to resort to my knowledge of pretty good ways to deal with dicks like him.
@anon:
these guys are friends and enjoy creating havoc. dont mind them. i kind of like them here.. they are the only prejudiced lovers of this blog.
What do you expect me to do man ? You know him- he's beyond my control.
He Bhagwaan. ROFL!!.. Height of joblessness!!
Post a Comment
<< Home